Marshall Your Financial Forces Against Ebola Virus and Crowdfund It Faster than It Kills: Donate Against The Unthinkable

Medical authorities now talk about Ebola virus epidemic in Africa as a fast mutating executioner gaining apocalyptic momentum the longer the collective world response remains insufficient.

Donate and spread the word on your Blogs — Reblog this, Facebook it, Tweet-it, and recognize this is a fight for the children of West Africa, and a fight to prevent overwhelmed health infrastructures leading to mass death across the world.

Give to:

CDC Global Disaster Response Fund

Americares Emergency Response Fund (Medical Supplies to Help Make Quarantine Operations Work)

Doctor’s Without Borders Emergency Ebola Response

Feed My Starving Children: Put Sierra Leone or Liberia for Food Relief under “Additional Information.”

See if your employer can send a matching donation. The time to donate is not after the virus mutates into an airborne threat, or after it has made it outside of West Africa into a new population without the infrastructure to isolate and quash it.

Prevention versus Reaction: Ebola, Airports, and WHO

There is an outbreak of the Ebola virus (Zaire strain) in West Africa affecting Guinea, Liberia, Mali, and Sierra Leone. Reportedly, one early patient was brought cross country on a crowded bus to Conakry, capitol of Guinea, before it was identified what he carried. Conakry’s airport services international flights. There have been two Ebola scares tied to flights out of Guinea: one in Canada and one in France.

The French Organization “Doctor’s Without Borders” called the current 2014 Guinea outbreak “unprecedented” in that it popped-up rapidly in disparate locations following its initial detection. Also unprecedented is the outbreak in a city of over 2 million, Conakry.

Speculations as to how the virus may have reached disparate areas:

(1) the virus had already been on the move under the radar before it was identified, and / or;

(2) it could be that a bush meat hunting or trapping operation culled a population of infected bats or monkeys and sold the meat on the road, or;

(3) somehow the virus was intentionally spread.

One and two are the most likely, but it may pay to see if any nation-state’s flight services ceased flying to and from the affected areas in the recent past, or, if there was a recent departure of a political adversary vying for leadership over the regime.

In any case, it seems irresponsible to continue to allow flights out of Conakry or other hot zones without fully screening would-be passengers on the ground before they ever enter a plane. Not to do so invites infection of flight crews and passenger rosters, not to mention the risk of spreading ebola to destination countries.

The time to discover symptoms is not during an international flight. Should word spread on a flight that another passenger is infected, panic could ensue on-board. That is not a good plan. Thorough screening must occur on the ground to keep Ebola (Zaire) contained.

Despite the rapidity of infection and spread, the World Health Organization has only downplayed the outbreak, and recommended that routine travel in and out of the region not be suspended at a time the virus had already reached Guinea’s capitol. Until verifiable disease control exists on the ground, WHO’s recommendation stands out as irresponsible.